Kazakhstan journal for oil & gas industryKazakhstan journal for oil & gas industry2707-42262957-806XKMG Engineering10879910.54859/kjogi108799Research ArticleFracture Modeling of a Carbonate Reservoir: A Case Study of the East Urikhtau FieldKereyevAnuar B.a.kereyev@kmge.kzhttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-7494-0584AldebekAlmira Ye.a.aldebek@kmge.kzhttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-2233-4412BondarukVladislav V.v.bondaruk@kmge.kzhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-6791-7290MardanovAltynbek S.a.mardanov@kmge.kzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8342-3046Atyrau branch of KMG Engineering110420257119311211202404032025Copyright © 2025, Kereyev A.B., Aldebek A.Y., Bondaruk V.V., Mardanov A.S.2025<p><strong>Background:</strong> Fracture Modeling of carbonate reservoirs plays a key role in predicting well productivity and enhancing field development efficiency. The East Urikhtau field, located in the eastern flank zone of the Pre-Caspian Depression, features a complex tectonic structure with an extensive system of faults and fractures. These geological features significantly impact the filtration and storage properties of carbonate reservoirs, making advanced geological modeling techniques necessary. A comprehensive fracture model allows a more precise evaluation of structural heterogeneities and their effect on hydrocarbon migration and accumulation.</p> <p><strong>Aim:</strong> A three-dimensional fracture model of a carbonate reservoir was developed to identify highly fractured zones and evaluate their correlation with well productivity. This model is essential for improving the accuracy of reservoir filtration-capacity property predictions and designing effective strategies for the field’s further development.</p> <p><strong>Materials and methods:</strong> Modern geological modeling techniques were applied in this study, including FMI data interpretation, core analysis, seismic attributes, and Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) modeling. Initial geological and geophysical data were processed using Petrel software, utilizing Ant Tracking and Distance to Object methods to determine fracture orientations and intensities. The developed trend model served as the foundation for discrete fracture modeling, enabling the quantitative assessment of fracture intensity and the identification of the most promising zones for further development.</p> <p>Results: The results of this study demonstrate that the developed fracture model facilitated the detailed identification of highly fractured zones and established their correlation with well productivity. It was found that the most intensely fractured zones are located near faults, as confirmed by fluid flow rate analysis. The application of Ant Tracking and DFN methods reduced uncertainties in the inter-well space and improved predictions of the reservoir’s filtration-capacity properties.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed methodology allows for a more detailed characterization of the geological structure, enhances the accuracy of well productivity forecasting, and optimizes development planning. The obtained data can be used for designing new wells and adjusting field development strategies for reservoirs with dual porosity and permeability.</p>3D geological modelFMIseismic attributewell productivitypermeabilitycarbonate depositsfracturingPetrelobject modelingDFN3D геологиялық модельFMIсейсмикалық атрибутұңғымалардың өнімділігіөткізгіштіккарбонатты шөгінділержарықшақтылықPetrelобъектілік модельдеуDFN3D геологическая модельFMIсейсмический атрибутпродуктивность скважинпроницаемостькарбонатные отложениятрещиноватостьPetrelобъектное моделированиеDFN1.Abilkhassimov KB. Osobennosti formirovaniya prirodnykh rezervuarov paleozoyskikh otlozheniy Prikaspiyskoy vpadiny i otsenka perspektiv ikh neftegazonosnosti. Moscow: Publishing House of the Academy of Natural Sciences; 2016. 244 p. (In Russ).2.Romm ES. Fil’tratsionnye svoystva treshchinovatykh gornykh porod. Moscow: Nedra; 1966. 271 p. (In Russ).3.Gudok NS, Bogdanovich NN, Martynov VG. Opredeleniye phizicheskikh svoystv neftevodosoderzhashchikh porod: uchebnoye posobiye dlya vuzov. Moscow: Nedra 2007. (In Russ).4.Bulach MK, Belonovskaya LG. Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii po izucheniyu i prognozu kollektorov nefti i gaza slozhnogo tipa. Leningrad: VNIGRI; 1989. 103 p. (In Russ).5.Bagrintseva KI. Conditions for the formation and properties of carbonate oil and gas reservoirs. Moscow: RGGU, 1999. 285 p. (In Russ).6.Dalyan IB. Osobennosti tektoniki podsolevykh kompleksov vostochnoy okrainy Prikaspiyskoy vpadiny v svyazi s neftegazonosnost’yu. Russian Oil and Gas Geology. 1996;6:8–17.7.Brazhnikov OG. Perspektivy neftegazonosnosti Prikaspiyskoy vpadiny s pozitsii tektoniki plit [dissertation]. Moscow; 1993. Available from: https://earthpapers.net/perspektivy-neftegazonosnosti-prikaspiyskoy-vpadiny-s-pozitsii-tektoniki-plit. (In Russ).8.Kozaev AA, Shchukovsky RM, Zakrevsky KY. Modelirovaniye treshchinovatosti. Praktikum po DFN v Petrel 2016–2019. Moscow: MAI; 2019. 94 p. (In Russ).9.Zholtaev GZ, Kulumbetova GY. Kharakteristika karbonatnykh i terrigennykh podsolevykh otlozheniy vostoka Prikaspiyskoy vpadiny. Nedra Povolzh’ya i Prikaspiya. 2019;98:65 –77. doi: 10.24411/1997-8316-2019-19805. (In Russ).10.Azhgaliev DK. Utochneniye modeli stroeniya podsolevoy tolshchi vostochnoy bortovoy zony Prikaspiyskoy vpadiny. Russian Oil and Gas Geology. 2019;6:31–40. doi: 10.31087/0016-7894-2019-6-31-40.