Қазақстанның мұнай-газ саласының хабаршысыҚазақстанның мұнай-газ саласының хабаршысы2707-42262957-806XKMG Engineering10883310.54859/kjogi108833Review ArticleOpportunities and Challenges for Joint Ventures in the SHIVA World: Applicability to KazakhstanJakiyevAssylbek M.a.jakiyev@petrocouncil.kzhttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-7625-6129AbdykhalykovKairzhan A.<p>PhD</p>k.abdykhalykov@kbtu.kzhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-6525-100XAssociation of Legal Entities “Oil and Gas Council of Kazakhstan “PetroCouncil”Kazakh-British Technical University11042025711141261203202518032025Copyright © 2025, Jakiyev A.M., Abdykhalykov K.A.2025<p>The purpose of the article is to analyze the opportunities and challenges faced by Joint Ventures (JVs) in the context of the SHIVA world and to assess their relevance and applicability to Kazakhstan. The study aims to identify key factors for JV success in the context of modern global challenges and uncertainties.</p> <p>The following research methods were used in the article: literature review – analysis of existing studies and theoretical models of JVs and the SHIVA concept; comparative analysis – study of global and regional JV practices to identify common patterns and differences; case study – analysis of successful JVs in various industries and their applicability to Kazakhstan. The study reveals that JVs offer significant strategic benefits, including access to novel technologies, resource optimization, and market expansion. Nevertheless, challenges such as cultural disparities, governance intricacies, and knowledge safeguarding persist as critical obstacles. An analysis of global JV instances, including Tesla’s partnerships and collaborations in China’s automotive industry, underscores the significance of trust, strategic coherence, and flexible governance structures. Furthermore, in the energy industry, particularly the oil and gas sector, JVs contribute significantly to risk-sharing, technological advancement, and regulatory conformity. The integration of AI and big data analytics into energy JVs enhances predictive maintenance, reservoir modeling, supply chain visibility, and contract administration. JVs continue to be a crucial strategy for promoting global business expansion, but their success hinges on meticulous planning, effective management, and the capacity to adapt to swiftly evolving market circumstances. Digital transformation, especially through the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data analytics, is revolutionizing JV operations by improving efficiency and mitigating risks. Future JV models must focus on strategic adaptability, sustainable governance mechanisms, and digital integration in order to remain competitive in the hyper-connected global economy. In particular, the energy sector is undergoing a transformation through digitalization and AI-powered solutions, enabling companies to navigate operational intricacies, enhance decision-making processes, and achieve long-term sustainability in their JVs.</p>joint venturesstrategic partnershipsglobalizationknowledge exchangedigital transformationrisk managementgovernanceinnovationemerging marketsoil and gas industryбірлескен кәсіпорындарстратегиялық серіктестіктержаһанданубілім алмасуцифрлық трансформациятәуекелдерді басқарубасқаруинновациядамушы нарықтармұнай-газ өнеркәсібісовместные предприятиястратегическое партнерствоглобализацияобмен знаниямицифровая трансформацияуправление рискамиуправлениеинновацииразвивающиеся рынкинефтегазовая промышленность1.ecopsy.ru [интернет]. SHIVA-mir. Ecopsy. Дата обращения 04.02.2025. Available from: https://www.ecopsy.ru/insights/shivamir.2.Kalitanyi V. Global business environment. In: Atiku SO, editor. Contemporary Multicultural Orientations and Practices for Global Leadership. 2019. P. 1–24.3.Morrison J. The international business environment: diversity and the global economy. London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.4.Akunyumu S., Fugar F.D., Adinyira E. Evaluation of risks affecting international construction JV (ICJV) projects in Ghana // J Eng Des Technol. 2024. Vol. 22, N 6. P. 1797–1824. doi: 10.1108/JEDT-06-2022-0299.5.Lytvynenko A., Lytvynenko O. Directions of functioning of international business in the globalized environment // Internauka. Series: Economic Sciences. 2022. Vol. 1. P. 142–147. doi: 10.25313/2520-2294-2022-1-7871.6.Popadić D., Živanović N., Živanović V. Characteristics of modern business of industrial companies on a global level // Экономика и управление: проблемы, решения. 2022. Том IV. С. 75–80. doi: 10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2022.05.04.010.7.Khan Z., Lew Y.K., Sinkovics R.R. International JVs as boundary spanners: Technological knowledge transfer in an emerging economy // Glob Strateg J. 2015. Vol. 5. P. 48–68. doi: 10.1002/gsj.1089.8.Sun S.L., Lee R.P. Enhancing innovation through international JV portfolios: From the emerging firm perspective // J Int Mark. 2013.Vol. 21, N 3. P. 1–23. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/23488033.9.Benavides-Espinosa M.D., Roig-Dobón S. The role of entrepreneurs in transferring knowledge through human resource management and JV // Int J Manpow. 2011. Vol. 32, N 2. P. 117–131. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437721111121260.10.Ferretti M., Guerini M., Panetti E., Parmentola A. The partner next door? The effect of micro-geographical proximity on intra-cluster inter-organizational relationships // Technovation. 2021. Vol. 110. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102390.11.Hoang H., Rothaermel F.T. How to manage alliances strategically // MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 2016. Vol. 58, N 1. P. 69–76.12.Cheong T., Song S.H., Hu C. Strategic alliance with competitors in the electric vehicle market: Tesla Motor’s case // Math Probl Eng. 2016. Vol. 2016, Issue 1. P. 1–10. doi: 10.1155/2016/7210767.13.Husain Z. Successful collaboration leads to effective technology transfer at Hero MotoCorp, Ltd // Glob Bus Organ Excell. 2020. Vol. 39, N 1. P. 17–28. doi: 10.1002/joe.21991.14.Jancenelle V.E., Wei S., Ang T. Market orientation heterogeneity and new JV formation announcements: Creating value for parent firms // J Strategy Manag. 2020. Vol. 13, N 2. P. 109–130. doi: 10.1108/JSMA-11-2019-0196.15.Kumar S., Park J. Partner characteristics, information asymmetry, and the signaling effects of JVs // Manag Decis Econ. 2012. Vol. 33, N 2. P. 127–145.16.Dunlap D.R., McDonough E.F., Mudambi R., Swift T. Making up is hard to do: Knowledge acquisition strategies and the nature of new product innovation // J Prod Innov Manag. 2016. Vol. 33, N 4. P. 472–491. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12298.17.Tetteh M.O., Chan A.P., Darko A., Nani G. Factors affecting international construction JVs: A systematic literature review // Int J Constr Manag. 2020. Vol. 23, N 1. P. 98–113. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1850203.18.Lee H., Biglaiser G., Staats J.L. The effects of political risk on different entry modes of foreign direct investment // Int Interact. 2014. Vol. 40, N 5. P. 683–710. doi: 10.1080/03050629.2014.899225.19.Cherbib J., Bahri F., Berraies S., Chebbi H. Towards the co-evolution of multinationals’ and local firms’ global strategies in an uncertain environment: Insights from international JVs // J Int Manag. 2023. Vol. 29, N 2. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2023.101089.20.Glambosky M., Gleason K., Wiggenhorn J. Joint ventures between US MNCs and foreign governments // Int J Manag Finance. 2011. Vol. 7. N 3. P. 238–258. doi: 10.1108/17439131111144450.21.Ikuabe M.O., Aigbavboa C.O., Thwala W.D., et al. Risks of JV formation in the South African construction industry // Int J Constr Manag. 2022. Vol. 23, N 14. P. 2391–2399. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2022.2059913.22.Winkler J., Moser R. Coping with strategic uncertainty: Framework development and scenario derivation for a JV decision in the Russian truck industry // Foresight. 2016. Vol. 18, N 4. P. 357–378. doi: 10.1108/FS-01-2016-0002.23.Muñoz de Prat J., Escriva-Beltran M., Gómez-Calvet R. Joint ventures and sustainable development: A bibliometric analysis // Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12, N 23. doi: 10.3390/su122310176.24.Haeruddin M.I.M., Farhansyah A., Haeruddin M.I.W., Mansur M.A.R. We could be so good together: A presentation of the multinational enterprises’ international JV strategy effectiveness // Int J Educ Adm Manag Leadersh. 2020. Vol. 1, N 2. P. 77–84. doi: 10.51629/ijeamal.v1i2.9.25.Suresh A.S. Joint venture V/S strategic alliance – the better option // ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 2014. Vol. 4, N 3. P. 1–11.26.Miller R.R., et al. International JVs in developing countries: Happy marriages? Washington, DC : International Finance Corporation, 1996. 25 p.27.Ongsakul V., Parameswar N., Dhir S. Factors affecting the nature of alliance governance and competitiveness // J Bus Retail Manag Res. 2019. Vol. 13. P. 9–23. doi: 10.24052/JBRMR/V13ISSP/ART-2.28.Chrysostome E.V., Nigam R.S., Jarilowski C.S. Revisiting strategic learning in international JVs: A knowledge creation perspective // Int J Manag. 2013. Vol. 30, N 1.29.Kumar M.V. Differential gains between partners in JVs: Role of resource appropriation and private benefits // Organ Sci. 2010. Vol. 21. P. 232–248. doi: 10.2307/27765962.30.Adams J.D., Link A.N. The structure and performance of U.S. research JVs: Inferences and implications from the Advanced Technology Program // Econ Innov New Technol. 201. Vol. 27. P. 551–575.31.Vrande V.V., Vanhaverbeke W., Duysters G. Additivity and complementarity in external technology sourcing: The added value of corporate venture capital investments // IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 2011. Vol. 58, N 3. P. 483–496. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2010.2091134.32.Stringham E.P., Miller J.K., Clark J.R. Overcoming barriers to entry in an established industry: Tesla Motors // Calif Manag Rev. 2015. Vol. 57, N 4. P. 103–128.33.Perkins G., Murmann J.P. What does the success of Tesla mean for the future dynamics in the global automobile sector? // Manag Organ Rev. 2018. Vol. 14, N 3. P. 471–480. doi: 10.1017/mor.2018.31.34.Nam K. Learning through the international JV: Lessons from the experience of China’s automotive sector // Ind Corp Change. 2011. Vol. 20, N 3. P. 855–907. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtr015.35.Lee K., Madanoglu M., Ko J. Developing a competitive international service strategy: A case of international JV in the global service industry // J Serv Mark. 2013. Vol. 27, N 3. P. 245–255. doi: 10.1108/08876041311330735.36.Merchant H. Configurations of governance structure, generic strategy, and firm size: Opening the black box of value creation in international JVs // Glob Strategy J. 2014. Vol. 4, N 4. P. 292–309. doi: 10.1002/gsj.1084.37.Kim H., Park B.I., Al-Tabbaa O., Khan Z. Knowledge transfer and protection in international JVs: An integrative review // Int Bus Rev. 2024. Vol. 33, N 15 doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102300.38.Hwang B., Zhao X., Chin E.W. International construction JVs between Singapore and developing countries // Eng Constr Archit Manag. 2017. Vol. 24, N 2. P. 209–228. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-03-2015-0035.39.Debellis F., Massis A.D., Petruzzelli A.M., et al. Strategic agility and international JVs: The willingness-ability paradox of family firms // J Int Manag. 2020. Vol. 27, N 1. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2020.100739.40.Park C., Oh C.H., Kasim A. Market challenges, learning and customer orientation, and innovativeness in IJVs // Int Mark Rev. 2017. Vol. 34, N 6. P. 945–967. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IMR-07-2014-0238.41.Shu C., Jin J.L., Zhou K.Z. A contingent view of partner coopetition in international JVs // J Int Mark. 2017. Vol. 25, N 2. P. 42–60. doi: 10.1509/jim.16.0075.42.Day G.S., Schoemaker P.J. Adapting to fast-changing markets and technologies // Calif Manag Rev. 2016. Vol. 58. N 4. P. 59–77. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.59.43.Mori Y. Ex ante investment, ex post adaptation, and joint ownership // Econ Lett. 2020. Vol. 187. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2019.108927.44.Lebedev S.A., Lin Z., Peng M.W. Power imbalance and value creation in JVs // Long Range Plan. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102014.45.Mantecón T.A., Song K., Luo H. The control and performance of JVs // Financ Manag. 2016. Vol. 45, N 2. P. 431–465. doi: 10.1111/fima.12100.46.Wong A.S., Wei L., Wang X., Tjosvold D. Collectivist values for constructive conflict management in international JV effectiveness // Int J Confl Manag. 2018. Vol. 29, N 1. P. 126–143. doi: 10.1108/IJCMA-08-2017-0071.47.Bamford J.D., Drutowski M., Fernandes L., et al. Misalignment management in JVs: drafting JV agreements to prevent, de‐escalate, and resolve disputes // Negotiation Journal. 2022.48.Devarakonda S.V., Klijn E., Reuer J.J., Duplat V. Institutional differences and arbitration mechanisms in international JVs // Global Strategy Journal. 2019. Vol. 11, N 2. P. 125–155. doi: 10.1002/gsj.1351.49.Velez-Calle A. Exploring instances of deviation in JVs between partners’ equity share and board representation // Int J Organ Anal. 2020. Vol. 28, N 1. P. 260–273. doi: 10.1108/IJOA-11-2018-1598.50.Huang M., Chiu Y. A knowledge tension perspective on management control and performance in international JVs // J Int Manag. 2020. Vol. 26, N 4. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2020.100797.51.Thilakarathne N, Rathnasinghe AP, Kulatunga U, et al. An investigation of the conflict management strategies in international construction JVs of Sri Lanka // J Financ Manag Prop Constr. 2023. Vol. 28, N 3. P. 273–292. doi: 10.1108/JFMPC-03-2022-0018.