<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1d1" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">Kazakhstan journal for oil &amp; gas industry</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Kazakhstan journal for oil &amp; gas industry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2707-4226</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2957-806X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>KMG Engineering</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">108866</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54859/kjogi108866</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Optimizing gas injection in high-pressure carbonate reservoirs: controlling bottomhole and tubing head pressures to avoid formation fracturing</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Khassanov</surname><given-names>Bakhytzhan K.</given-names></name><email>b.khassanov@kbv.kz</email><uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2006-9127</uri><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Stepanchuk</surname><given-names>Artem M.</given-names></name><email>a.stepanchuk@kbv.kz</email><uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6022-7141</uri><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zholdybayeva</surname><given-names>Assel T.</given-names></name><email>a.zholdybayeva@kbv.kz</email><uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1015-0593</uri><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff-1">Kashagan B.V.</aff><pub-date date-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2025-09-26" publication-format="electronic"><day>26</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>22</fpage><lpage>31</lpage><history><pub-date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-04-23"><day>23</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-08-26"><day>26</day><month>08</month><year>2025</year></pub-date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2025, Khassanov B.K., Stepanchuk A.M., Zholdybayeva A.T.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year></permissions><abstract>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;:&lt;/strong&gt; In high-pressure carbonate reservoirs, miscible gas injection is a key method for enhancing oil recovery and maintaining reservoir pressure. The main challenge lies in controlling bottomhole pressure (BHP) and tubing head pressure (THP) while maximizing injection volumes and preventing formation fracturing. Current strategies typically rely on THP regulation and injection rates as the primary means of well control.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aim&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aims to analyze an optimized gas injection strategy based on precise well control to prevent formation fracturing and improve injection efficiency.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Materials&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; and methods:&lt;/strong&gt; The study uses production and geological data analysis, empirical forecasting models, and statistical techniques to enhance the accuracy and reliability of predictions. Modern algorithms and data-processing technologies are applied to handle large datasets, allowing for more accurate and consistent forecasts of key field development indicators.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;:&lt;/strong&gt; The results indicate that gas injection can be optimized by lowering reservoir pressure and increasing tubing head pressure (THP). This stabilizes bottomhole pressure (BHP) because of increased frictional losses in the tubing string. Controlling THP and gas rates allows stable BHP operation. Currently, maximum BHP limits have been established for the wells, while allowable THP is restricted but can be increased based on previous test results. An increase in THP would enable higher gas injection volumes, leading to improved oil recovery. BHP remained within safe limits and was monitored directly with downhole pressure gauges.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;:&lt;/strong&gt; This study presents an optimized approach to gas injection management, based on real-time pressure monitoring, well–reservoir nodal analysis, dynamic control of tubing head pressure (THP), and regulation of gas flow rates. The results emphasize the need to consider nonlinear pressure losses when designing safe and efficient injection strategies. Considering these effects helps prevent formation fracturing and ensures long-term reservoir integrity.&lt;/p&gt;</abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>carbonate reservoir</kwd><kwd>high-pressure carbonate reservoir</kwd><kwd>PROSPER</kwd><kwd>nodal analysis</kwd><kwd>statistical analysis</kwd><kwd>tubing head pressure (THP)</kwd><kwd>bottomhole pressure (BHP)</kwd><kwd>optimization</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="kk"><kwd>карбонатты коллектор</kwd><kwd>жоғары қабат қысымы</kwd><kwd>PROSPER</kwd><kwd>түйінді талдау</kwd><kwd>статистика</kwd><kwd>сорғының сағалық қысымы</kwd><kwd>ұңғыма түбінің қысымы</kwd><kwd>оңтайландыру</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>карбонатный коллектор</kwd><kwd>высокое пластовое давление</kwd><kwd>PROSPER</kwd><kwd>узловой анализ</kwd><kwd>статистика</kwd><kwd>устьевое давление закачки</kwd><kwd>забойное давление</kwd><kwd>оптимизация</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Mukanov AR, Bigeldiyev A, Batu A, Kuvanyshev AM. Features of field development with tight carbonate reservoirs by waterflooding. SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference; 2020 Oct 21–22; Virtual. Available from: onepetro.org/SPECTCE/proceedings-abstract/20CTC/20CTC/.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Bakirov AI. Sovershenstvovaniye tehnologii izvlecheniya nefti zavodneniyem iz karbonatnykh kollektorov mestorozhdeniy [dissertation]. Bugulma; 2018. Available from: www.dissercat.com/content/sovershenstvovanie-tekhnologii-izvlecheniya-nefti-zavodneniem-iz-karbonatnykh-kollektorov. (In Russ).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Ahmed TH. Equations of state and PVT analysis: Applications for improved reservoir modeling. Houston, TX: Gulf Professional Publishing; 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Iktissanov VA, Bobb IF, Ganiev BG. Study of the problem of optimization of bottomhole pressure for fractured-porous reservoirs. Oil Industry. 2017;10:94–97. doi: 10.24887/0028-2448-2017-10-94-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>TatNIPIneft. Metodicheskoye rukovodstvo po opredeleniyu predelno-dopustimykh zaboynykh davleniy (RD 153-39.0-918-15). Bugulma: PAO «Tatneft’»; 2015. 29 p. (In Russ).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Holmes JA, Barkve T, Lund. Application of a multisegment well model to simulate flow in advanced wells. SPE European Petroleum Conference; 1998 Oct 20–22; The Hague, Netherlands. Available from: onepetro.org/SPEEURO/proceedings-abstract/98EUROPEC/98EUROPEC/SPE-50646-MS/191110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Semenov A, Altaf B, Allouti A, et al. History matching of integrated reservoir simulation model for green field offshore Abu Dhabi. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition &amp; Conference; 2017 Nov 13–16; Abu Dhabi, UAE. Available from: onepetro.org/SPEADIP/proceedings-abstract/17ADIP/17ADIP/D021S030R002/200153.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Peng L, Han G, Chen Z, et al. Dynamically coupled reservoir and wellbore simulation research in two-phase flow systems: A critical review. Processes. 2022;10(9):1778. doi: 10.3390/pr10091778.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Schreiber M, Pruess K, Garcia J. Optimizing oil recovery: A sector model study of CO2-water alternating gas injection. Processes. 2022;13(3):700. doi: 10.3390/pr13030700.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Pan Y, Liu X, Yang Z. Study on the Stabilization Mechanism of Gas Injection Interface in Fractured-Vuggy Reservoirs. Energies. 2025;18(8):1996. doi: 10.3390/en18081996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Danesh A. PVT and phase behaviour of petroleum reservoir fluids, Developments in Petroleum Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1998. 400 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>McCain WD, Jr. The properties of petroleum fluids (2nd ed.). Tulsa: PennWell Publishing Company; 1990.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Iktissanov VA, Bobb IF, Fokeeva LH. Consequences of bottom-hole pressure deviations from optimal values. Oil Industry. 2017;8:60–64. (In Russ).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Gerhart PM, Gerhart AL, Hochstein JI. Munson, Young and Okiishi’s fundamentals of fluid mechanics (8th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2016. 816 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Ahmed TH. Reservoir engineering handbook (2nd ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Professional Publishing; 2001. 1000 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Mukherjee H, Brill JP. Multiphase flow in wells (Monograph Series No. 17). Richardson, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers; 1999. 156 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Economides MJ, Hill AD, Ehlig-Economides CA. Petroleum production systems (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2012. 609 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Beggs HD. Production optimization: Using nodal analysis for oil and gas production (Rev. ed.). Tulsa, OK: OGCI and Petroskills Publications; 2003. 411 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
