<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1d1" xml:lang="kk"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">Қазақстанның мұнай-газ саласының хабаршысы</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Қазақстанның мұнай-газ саласының хабаршысы</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2707-4226</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2957-806X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>KMG Engineering</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">108936</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54859/kjogi108936</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Structural modeling and analysis of causes of cost overruns in oil and gas projects in Kazakhstan</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Syzdykov</surname><given-names>Murat K.</given-names></name><email>murat.kaznitu@gmail.com</email><uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-0531</uri><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Taikulakova</surname><given-names>Gulnura S.</given-names></name><bio>&lt;p&gt;Cand. Sc. (Economy), Professor&lt;/p&gt;</bio><email>gulnuratgs@mail.ru</email><uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9852-6083</uri><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shakulikova</surname><given-names>Gulzada T.</given-names></name><bio>&lt;p&gt;Doct. Sc. (Economy), Professor&lt;/p&gt;</bio><email>gulzadash@gmail.com</email><uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8779-9614</uri><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff-1">Satbayev University</aff><aff id="aff-2">Almaty Management University</aff><aff id="aff-3">Atyrau Oil and Gas University</aff><pub-date date-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2025-12-24" publication-format="electronic"><day>24</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>133</fpage><lpage>142</lpage><history><pub-date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-11-10"><day>10</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-11-26"><day>26</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></pub-date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2025, Syzdykov M.K., Taikulakova G.S., Shakulikova G.T.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year></permissions><abstract>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The oil and gas industry frequently face budget overrun issues. Project costs increase, stakeholders are dissatisfied, and overall performance suffers. To avoid this, it is important to find effective methods for preventing or mitigating the risk of cost overruns.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aim:&lt;/strong&gt; The objective of the study is to analyze the relationship between resource-related factors, such as labor, equipment, and material factors, and cost overruns in the oil and gas projects in Kazakhstan.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Materials and methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A structured survey consisting of 15 resource-related risk factors was distributed to experienced professionals working in the oil and gas sector. A total of 172 valid responses were gathered. The data were evaluated using descriptive statistics, econometric methods and partial-least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to assess reliability, validity, causal relationships, and regressed variables.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; The empirical analysis shows that labor-related risks, including labor shortages, low productivity, and labor incompetence, have the most substantial and statistically significant impact on cost overruns. Material-related and equipment-related risks demonstrate a moderate yet meaningful effect. All three latent constructs exhibit internal consistency and convergent validity. Furthermore, change orders and financial difficulties are also strong contributors to cost escalations.&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;The study concludes that effective resource planning is critical for minimizing cost overruns and ensuring the successful execution of oil and gas projects in Kazakhstan. Improving workforce competency, enhancing material supply reliability, and efficiently providing physical resources are recommended practices for overall project management body of knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;</abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>resource management</kwd><kwd>risk management</kwd><kwd>oil and gas projects</kwd><kwd>cost overruns</kwd><kwd>structural equation modeling</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="kk"><kwd>ресурстарды басқару</kwd><kwd>тәуекелдерді басқару</kwd><kwd>мұнай-газ жобалары</kwd><kwd>шығындардың асып кетуі</kwd><kwd>құрылымдық теңдеулерді модельдеу</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>управление ресурсами</kwd><kwd>управление рисками</kwd><kwd>нефтегазовые проекты</kwd><kwd>перерасход средств</kwd><kwd>моделирование структурных уравнений</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Merrow E.W. Oil and gas industry megaprojects: Our recent track record // Oil and Gas Facilities. 2012. Vol. 1, Issue 02. P. 38–42. doi: 10.4043/21858-MS.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>offshore-technology.com [интернет]. Chevron’s Kazakhstan oil expansion project faces cost increase of $1.5bn [дата обращения 01.10.2025]. Доступ по ссылке: offshore-technology.com/news/chevrons-kazakhstan-1-5bn/.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. 6th ed. Pennsylvania : Project Management Insitute, 2017. 711 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Chanmeka A., Thomas S.R., Caldas C.H., Mulva S.P. Assessing key factors impacting the performance and productivity of oil and gas projects in Alberta // Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2012. Vol. 39, N 3. P. 259–270. doi: 10.1139/l11-128.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Shash A.A., AbuAlnaja F.M. Causes of material delays in capital projects in Saudi Arabia // International Journal of Construction Management. 2021. Vol. 23, Issue 7. P. 1109–1117. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2021.1956294.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Aziz R.F. Ranking of delay factors in construction projects after Egyptian revolution // Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2013. Vol. 52, Issue 3. P. 387–406. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2013.03.002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Odeh A.M., Battaineh H.T. Causes of construction delay: Traditional contracts // International Journal of Project Management. 2002. Vol. 20, Issue 1. P. 67–73. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00037-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Sambasivan M., Soon Y.W. Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry // International Journal of Project Management. 2007. Vol. 25, Issue 5. P. 517–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Syzdykov M., Seitimov T., Baibussinova Z. Re-Visiting the project risk management framework and adapting it for the Kazakh oil and gas industry. SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference; Oct 21–22, 2020; Virtual. Available from: onepetro.org/SPECTCE/proceedings-abstract/20CTC/20CTC/449739.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Dong S., Ahmed M., Chatpattananan V. Analysis of Key Factors of Cost Overrun in Construction Projects Based on Structural Equation Modeling // Sustainability. 2025. Vol. 17, Issue 5. doi: 10.3390/su17052119.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen T., Chileshe N., Ho D.T., et al. Significant risks that trigger cost overruns and delays in urban rail projects: a typical case study of Vietnam // Built Environment Project and Asset Management. 2024. Vol. 14, N 2. P. 278–95. doi: 10.1108/BEPAM-01-2023-0027.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Nuako F., Ghansah F.A., Adusei T. Critical success factors for cost overrun minimization in public construction projects in developing countries: The case of Ghana // Construction Innovation. 2024. doi: 10.1108/CI-07-2022-0176.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Mosly I. Construction Cost-Influencing Factors: Insights from a Survey of Engineers in Saudi Arabia // Buildings. 2024. Vol. 14, Issue 11. doi: 10.3390/buildings14113399.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Islam M.S., Nepal M., Skitmore M. Structuring risks for a comprehensive understanding of cost overruns in power plant projects // Construction Innovation. 2023. Vol. 25. N 3. P. 1014–1032. doi: 10.1108/CI-05-2022-0120.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Sohrabi H., Noorzai E. Risk assessment in Iranian oil and gas construction industry: a process approach // International Journal of Quality &amp; Reliability Management. 2023. Vol. 40, N 1. P. 124–147. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-03-2021-0069.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
